College+Prep+CH+-+Tyler+He+&+Leo+Chingcuanco+neg

Round 3 Negative vs. Dallas Jesuit OG
1-off, Spanos

NIETZSCHE K – 1NC
//Nietzsche transvalues...new advantages and new strength// //To preach and announce...its enemy twin// //There is also an important difference...has to be registered somewhere.// //The thought of eternal recurrence says ...ego-substance on to all things...// //In the University discourse, is not the upper level…obfuscating the unfreedom on which it relies.// Brian **Massumi,** Assosiate Professor of Communications at the Universite de Montreal, **and** Mary **Zournazi,** Philiosopher and PhD in Cultural Theory **2002,** Hope: New hiliosophies for Change, New York: Routledge p211-212.
 * The affirmative will always be able to locate some external threat to world order. It is not a coincidence that Breaking News occurs every fifteen minutes because international politics are unpredictable. The insecurities cited by the affirmative are not unique; international terrorism is in our neighborhoods and there might just be poison in our children's Halloween candy. The uncomfortable truth is that uncertainty and risk are part and parcel of human life. Rather than coming to terms with this, the affirmative encourages us to stay glued to the television screen, stocking up on duct tape and water. At issue here is not just life itself but what makes life valuable. We encourage indifference and carelessness in a world inherently characterized by insecurity in an attempt to reclaim joy from the affirmative's world of paranoid tiptoeing.**
 * James Der Derian** is a Watson Institute research professor of international studies (Brown University), **1993**, The Political Subject of Violence, ([ http://www.ciaonet.org/boo k/lipschutz/lipschutz12.ht ml ]http://www.ciaonet.org/boo k/lipschutz/lipschutz12.ht ml ),
 * Next, the 1AC's invocation of the "good" of humanity as the basis for action is not an ahistorical notion, it is rooted in a civilizational process of valuating different types of being. This logic internally necessitates the creation of an "evil" inhuman enemy- endless wars and genocides have been carried out under the banner of humanism**
 * Rasch 2003** (William, Prof of Germanic Studies @ Indiana University, "Human Rights as Geopolitics: Carl Schmitt and the Legal Form of American Supremacy", Cultured Critique 54) Tyler
 * Thus, our alternative is to vote negative in order to not implement the affirmative's plan. As opposed to the 1AC 's idea that political action which attempts to alleviate the suffering of past injustice is worthwhile, the Negative's call to forget the suffering associated with _  opens up the only space possible to allow action freed from the specter of constant anxiety.**
 * Zupancic 2003** (Alenka, Researcher at the Institute of philosophy @ U of Ljubljana, The Shortest Shadow: Nietzsche's Philosophy of the Two, p. 56-60)
 * The affirmative's idea that we must continually sacrifice ourselves and work towards a higher order to be achieved is an illusory moral construction that both denies the uniqueness of each moment in life as well as functions as a vehicle by which we as individuals are forced to redirect our creative forces towards resentment of ourselves and the world around us. In light of this, eternal recurrence teaches us that each moment is a new and infinite process of becoming- rather than living our lives in the shadow-like deferral of the New World Order promised by the plan, we must understand that all we have is this world, and that the choices we make will follow us for eternity.. Vote negative to affirm joy and freedom from resentment in the moment.**
 * Dolan 2003** (Frederick M, Prof Emeritus @ Berkeley, "NIETZSCHE AND LEGAL THEORY (PART I): NIETZSCHE'S GNOSIS OF LAW", 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 757) Tyler
 * The notion that the goal of life is life devalues life in the world. The negative states that there are things worth dying for in order to make a value to life.**
 * Zizek 2003** (Slavoj, Senior Researcher @ the University of Ljubljana, “Homo Sacer as the Object of the Discourse of the University”
 * We must separate hope from solvency and calculations, or the sitation makes hope impossible. We are asking you to seek hope in an uncertain present rather than deterring a future disaster**

NIETZSCHE K – Links
War on Terror through Nietzsche’s eyes, april 18 //Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda poses a dire threat to American lives in the world… to either react or allow us to move humanity forward.// //From president Bush’s opening lines of… balance of power is global suzerainty, and war is peace.//
 * The war on terror is the worst reactionary assertion, it resentfully identifies the US as good out of pure negation of the evil other – the terrorist.**
 * Alt-f4** – Case Western Blog **2006**
 * Hegemony is predicated on a violent will to order that seeks to elevate security to a transcendental idea. This moral framework for violence is not only a genocidal elimination of difference but also a ahatred of life, of the apparent world as it is.**
 * James Der Derian** is a Watson Institute research professor of international studies (Brown University), **1993** http://muse.jhu.edu.proxy.library.emory.edu/journals/boundary/v030/30.3derian.html

OTHER

 * There is nothing else. We read T/Theory. I’m not sure we’ve ever gone for a disad or CP.**